Here's a heartwarming story about late term abortion

Search

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
25,963
Tokens
[h=2]Gosnell medical assistant admits cutting the spines of 10 babies born alive[/h] by John Jalsevac

  • Tue Mar 19, 2013 18:10 EST
  • Comments (
    dots2.gif
    )
  • Tags: abortion, kermit gosnell






PHILADELPHIA, March 19, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The capital murder trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell continued today, with one of his former medical assistants taking the stand to describe how she helped kill at least 10 babies who were born alive by slitting their spinal cords.
Gosnell is charged with murder in the case of seven babies who were allegedly born alive before the abortionist killed them by severing their spines – his preferred method of “aborting” late-term babies, according to his former staff.
Adrienne_Moton-196x304.jpg
Adrienne Moton

Staff have testified that “hundreds” of newborn babies were killed in this fashion at Gosnell’s Philadelphia clinic, which was dubbed a “House of Horrors” after investigators raided the facility in February 2010.
He is also facing one additional count of third degree murder for the death of Karnamaya Mongar, 41, who sought an abortion at his clinic and was given a lethal overdose of medication.
Former medical assistant Adrienne Moton, who herself pleaded guilty to third degree murder charges in October last year, reportedly sobbed her way through her testimony in court today.
She recounted how she took a photograph with her cellphone of one baby she admitted killing, called “Baby A.” That photo was displayed on a large screen in the courtroom. (That photo can be seen on page 102 of the grand jury report.)
Moton said that the baby, which she estimated to be 30 weeks gestation, was pink, and that she thought that he could have survived.
The mother of “Baby A” also testified, telling the courtroom about the painful three-day abortion she underwent at Gosnell’s clinic when she was 17 years-old.
“I never felt pain like that, ever,” the woman said, according to the Associated Press. “I couldn’t talk to anybody and tell anybody.”
According to the grand jury report that was released in July 2011, Gosnell charged $2,500 for the “abortion,” after discovering that the baby was further along than he originally thought.
The grand jury report includes the account of another of Gosnell’s employees, Kareema Cross, describing the moment of Baby A’s birth:
After the baby was expelled, Cross noticed that he was breathing, though not for long. After about 10 to 20 seconds, while the mother was asleep, “the doctor just slit the neck,” said Cross. Gosnell put the boy’s body in a shoebox. Cross described the baby as so big that his feet and arms hung out over the sides of the container. Cross said that she saw the baby move after his neck was cut, and after the doctor placed it in the shoebox. Gosnell told her, “it’s the baby’s reflexes. It’s not really moving.”
A neonatologist who testified on behalf of the grand jury said that Gosnell’s explanation for the baby’s movements was false, and that in all likelihood Gosnell failed immediately to kill the baby, and that his “few moments of life were spent in excruciating pain.”
The neonatologist also estimated the baby’s age as around 32 weeks gestation.
Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!
Moton also testified in court that Gosnell joked about the size of Baby A, saying that he thought the baby was big enough to get up and walk to the bus stop.
The mother of Baby A was subsequently admitted to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with a severe infection and blood clots that had travelled to her lungs. According to her aunt, she nearly died, and took months to recover.
Investigators say that she was but one of numerous Gosnell’s clients who were injured during “abortions.”
Moton also recounted how in another case she slit the neck of a baby, known as Baby D, that was born alive in a toilet. That baby was estimated at 24.5 weeks gestation, the threshold for viability.
Moton, like many of those who assisted Gosnell at his facility, had no medical training. She was paid around $10 an hour, under the table, to perform tasks normally reserved for highly trained professionals.
She herself underwent two abortions at the hands of Gosnell.
Gosnell’s lawyer is arguing that the prosecution can’t prove that any of the seven babies he stands accused of murdering were born alive. He told the courtroom yesterday that the prosecution of his client is a racist-inspired “lynching.”
Prosecutor Joanne Pescatore said in her opening statements yesterday that under the law, if a baby is born alive, “you can’t kill it.”
"The baby is alive, you're a doctor, you have to do the minimum," she said. "If it moves, breathes, has a pulsating umbilical cord, you can't kill it. That's murder."
Pro-life activists have highlighted the irony that if Gosnell has been skilled enough to kill the babies before they were born, he would not now be facing murder charges.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
13,268
Tokens
Finally getting some media coverage on this
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,148
Tokens
THESE ARE THE MOST RECENT DIARIES FILED UNDER THIS TAG:
Gosnell Trial Puts Late Term Abortions Under the Microscope (Warning -- Graphic)
by Eternal Hope
35 Comments / 0 New on Fri Apr 12, 2013 at 06:38 PM PDT with 6 Recommends
Abortion, Kermit Gosnell, and "Official Indifference"
by Adam B
20 Comments / 20 New on Tue Feb 01, 2011 at 11:22 AM PST with 32 Recommends
Learning the Right Lessons From the Philadelphia Abortion Clinic Disaster
by RH Reality Check
36 Comments / 36 New on Mon Jan 31, 2011 at 09:06 AM PST with 30 Recommends
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
They needs to put her into a prison cell and toss the prision key into the deepest part of an ocean so she can't get out. That's what i think about this here issue on this here matter!

~~:
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Personally I'm pro life. Have kids of my own. I would never take part in an abortion (obviously not my body but agree to consent to one anyway). I am however pro choice politically because its not my body or my place. However, there needs to be limits. Late term is fucking nuts. Outlawing abortions totally thou would produce more Coldweathers, lets be rational
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,414
Tokens
I have gotten a lot more socially liberal in the last 5 years.
I use to lean hard right but have learned that a lot of my thinking was backwards.

I use to confuse my beliefs with with the thought process that my beliefs should be legislated.
I was dead wrong in that opinion.

I still have the same exact personal stance I have always had when my political beliefs were far right.
The only change I have made was my thought process on the governments roll in my beliefs.

How selfish and arrogent of me to think that just because I believe a certain way everyone should abide by my same beliefs.

I have turned left socially on virtually every single social issue except for two.

Abortion and gun rights. Im still open for debate on gun control.

But on the issue of abortion I have a hardline stance against it that will never go away.

I know some say "well chop you just said that you dont think the government should have a roll in legislating your beliefs. Isn't that the opposite of what you just said"

No its not for one very simple reason.

Until murder is legalized abortion by default should always be illegal.
Its a pretty shallow argument to say you cant tell a women what to do with her body.

Well what about the baby?

The link provided by the OP is disgusting. How any normal human being could defend what they were doing is a despicable person.

It has been scientifically proven that life starts at conception.

This should be the end of the conversation.

Until murder is legalized abortion should never even be considered an option under any circumstance unless the mother is in serious danger of losing her life.

There will never be a day anyone talks me out of this. So dont even try.

If gay people want to get married go ahead.
If people want to do illegal drugs have at it.

I dont care what anyone does with there life.

But dont you dare tell me that abortion has any place in a civilized country or any country for that matter.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,944
Tokens
I have gotten a lot more socially liberal in the last 5 years.
I use to lean hard right but have learned that a lot of my thinking was backwards.

I use to confuse my beliefs with with the thought process that my beliefs should be legislated.
I was dead wrong in that opinion.

I still have the same exact personal stance I have always had when my political beliefs were far right.
The only change I have made was my thought process on the governments roll in my beliefs.

How selfish and arrogent of me to think that just because I believe a certain way everyone should abide by my same beliefs.

I have turned left socially on virtually every single social issue except for two.

Abortion and gun rights. Im still open for debate on gun control.

But on the issue of abortion I have a hardline stance against it that will never go away.

I know some say "well chop you just said that you dont think the government should have a roll in legislating your beliefs. Isn't that the opposite of what you just said"

No its not for one very simple reason.

Until murder is legalized abortion by default should always be illegal.
Its a pretty shallow argument to say you cant tell a women what to do with her body.

Well what about the baby?

The link provided by the OP is disgusting. How any normal human being could defend what they were doing is a despicable person.

It has been scientifically proven that life starts at conception.

This should be the end of the conversation.

Until murder is legalized abortion should never even be considered an option under any circumstance unless the mother is in serious danger of losing her life.

There will never be a day anyone talks me out of this. So dont even try.

If gay people want to get married go ahead.
If people want to do illegal drugs have at it.

I dont care what anyone does with there life.

But dont you dare tell me that abortion has any place in a civilized country or any country for that matter.

The key thing that liberal abortion lovers ignore. The baby has rights. Period.

I agree with Chop 100% on this here issue.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,414
Tokens
The key thing that liberal abortion lovers ignore. The baby has rights. Period.

I agree with Chop 100% on this here issue.

I honestly dont know how any sane person can disagree.
My mind is blown by the fact that almost 50% of America thinks this is ok.

How did we get this way?
How selfish have we become to totally ignore the fact that you are killing a human being that is just as human as you and me all in the name of women's rights.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,414
Tokens
Chop,

What do you think about gays being able to adopt children?

Well 2 post ago I said I use to be socially right politically until about 5 years ago.
Morally I have not changed one bit. Im still just as right morally as ever.

Morally speaking im against gay people adopting children.
But politically I am not against it.

I hope this does not sound contradictory.

I would much rather a gay couple adopt a would be aborted baby.

The reason I have made this switch is because it is not biblical to judge.
The Bible is full of verses that speak about free will.

It is not my job or your job to judge.

So politically I do not have a problem with your question.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Chop,

What do you think about gays being able to adopt children?

A child needs a male and a female in their life. There are certain things men and woman cannot teach children about the opposite sex. But, I also think if a kid can be in a loving home instead of a foster home then I think that's a good thing.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Chop,

What do you think about gays being able to adopt children?

I know you asked Chop but im sure you wont mind me jumping in.

Would it serve a black kid better to have two butt fucking rim job loving homos as dads or be like the 68% of black children that grow up in single homes? Do you think there is any connection between no dad being in the home has an impact on all the crime that runs ramped in the black community? Little Tommy could grow up without a father, no respect, looking up to JayZ as a role model sell crack and either go to jail or suffer the 187. OR he could grow up with steve and stan growing up spending weekends at Ikea, knowing the entire discography of ABBA by the age of 10 and bakes cookies for gandmas social and goes of to college to be an engineer. Guess which has the better ROI?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
10,451
Tokens
I know you asked Chop but im sure you wont mind me jumping in.

Would it serve a black kid better to have two butt fucking rim job loving homos as dads or be like the 68% of black children that grow up in single homes? Do you think there is any connection between no dad being in the home has an impact on all the crime that runs ramped in the black community? Little Tommy could grow up without a father, no respect, looking up to JayZ as a role model sell crack and either go to jail or suffer the 187. OR he could grow up with steve and stan growing up spending weekends at Ikea, knowing the entire discography of ABBA by the age of 10 and bakes cookies for gandmas social and goes of to college to be an engineer. Guess which has the better ROI?
Haha, funny but true. A nice combo around these parts.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
10,451
Tokens
I honestly dont know how any sane person can disagree.
My mind is blown by the fact that almost 50% of America thinks this is ok.

How did we get this way?
How selfish have we become to totally ignore the fact that you are killing a human being that is just as human as you and me all in the name of women's rights.
Inconvenient things in a persons life can make them do strange things. Some people feel they shouldn't be punished with having a baby. Where did I hear that?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,944
Tokens
Well 2 post ago I said I use to be socially right politically until about 5 years ago.
Morally I have not changed one bit. Im still just as right morally as ever.

Morally speaking im against gay people adopting children.
But politically I am not against it.

I hope this does not sound contradictory.

I would much rather a gay couple adopt a would be aborted baby.

The reason I have made this switch is because it is not biblical to judge.
The Bible is full of verses that speak about free will.

It is not my job or your job to judge.

So politically I do not have a problem with your question.

1 Corinthians 2:15 - He that is spiritual judges all things.

John 7:24 - Judge not according to appearance, but judge righteous judgement

The word "judge" is used over 700 times in the Bible, people misquote that one verse against all the rest...

http://www.biblebelievers.com/jmelton/Judging.html
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,592
Messages
13,535,144
Members
100,377
Latest member
nocash117
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com